Sunday, February 9, 2014

The Surprise Pitfall in HMO’s


When you choose a PCP within an HMO, first find out which specialists that PCP refers to.


Recently I made a most remarkable discovery. When I entered the Medicare program, I had to choose a doctor. I had just moved to a new town and knew nothing about the doctors there, so I just picked one for my Primary Care Phyysician – PCP -- as a shot in the dark. I figured that if I didn’t like him, I would just switch to someone else in my HMO.



I was having second thoughts about this doctor already when something erupted on my nose quite rapidly. I showed it to my PCP and he said that it looked like a squamous cell skin cancer and that it needed to be removed immediately. He gave me the name of one dermatologist.



What? Only one? No choice at all? I went through my HMO booklet and found a couple of dozen dermatologists listed. In addition, I found a statement in there that I could self-refer myself to a dermatologist five times a year. But I called the doctor given by my PCP – whose appointment desk would only give me an appointment more than two months away. Since this thing was rapidly growing, that was unwise to say the least. I self-referred myself to another dermatology practice. Based on my description they got me in within 24 hours and wanted to do a biopsy immediately. However, I had found out more or less by accident that if I went to any specialist outside my HMO network, or in my case subnetwork (huh?), if that doctor did anything I was committing myself to pay for everything, not just the biopsy. So I had to back off.



This is when I found out that when I chose this PCP, without knowing it, I limited myself to specialists that PCP was aligned with. I could not just use anyone in the Humana HMO manual I had been sent.



This was completely unacceptable to me, and I mounted a campaign to be allowed to see a dermatologist within my HMO program but outside this secret network I had just found out about. Through insistent phone calls, I finally got Humana to agree to the outside referral; I was told that my PCP had to make the referral and that then they would approve it. I had their commitment and a reference number to the conversation. I had taken notes and read it back to them to make sure I had it right.



So I called my PCP’s office to get the referral. Instead, heir insurance specialist insisted that she had to go through her Humana representative … who declared that the person who authorized me to go to the dermatologist of my choice gave me “wrong” information. She then went “up the chain of command” and got me an appointment only one month away, still completely unacceptable. I think I got into a battle of wills with a Humana employee who wasn’t about to honor a patient request that bypassed her. If true, that says extremely negative things regarding the work culture at Humana.



So I found a loophole in the whole program that states that a member can change PCP’s to gain access to the specialist of their choice (as long as that specialist is within the HMO, which my choice was – I got them from my Humana manual).



So I changed PCP. His office also got me in within 24 hours, and he has made a rush referral to the dermatologist I went to and was so pleased with.



The biopsy should have been done and read by now if the man at the first dermatologist’s appointment desk had been reasonable. The biopsy would have been done already, and  surgery either done or imminent. A battle of wills with a bureaucrat at Humana helped prevent that. Interestingly, once the first dermatology office called regarding the appointment my first PCP had set up, I told them that it was much too far away for the circumstances, and that I had changed PCP’s. They immediately mounted an aggressive campaign to get me as a patient, suddenly declaring that they could see me “today or tomorrow,” and calling both me and the old PCP office multiple times. I had to call them and tell them in no uncertain terms to stop calling!



“Humana Gold Plus” sounds really good, doesn’t it? I knew about the standard restrictions of an HMO. I did not know that I had restricted myself to one dermatologist – and probably one orthopedist for my knee injury that’s on hold until the skin cancer is taken care of – and probably one opthomalogist for my cataracts. Etc. Moreover, I am not at all satisfied that my old PCP was what any reasonable person would call a “good” doctor, and I think he may have had only one alignment with a dermatologist for that reason. It may well be that other dermatologists did not choose to work with him. I don’t know, but I know that even within an HMO, one is supposed to have more than one choice.



Humana, by the way, told me a couple of things that simply weren’t true. When I spoke to one person, I emphasized the urgency of having this skin cancer taken care of, and he snidely commented that perhaps I should go to the emergency room. I called him on it and told him that it was an inappropriate suggestion and that he knew it. He treated me with respect after that (I was never at any time rude or abrupt with anyone in this process, but I suspect he might have been trying to anger me so that he would be justified in not considering what I was saying.)



Another Humana employee told me that “most” doctors in Florida were in these invisible, secret subgroups. In actuality, neither the dermatologist’s office nor my new PCP’s office knew what I was talking about. I don’t know why my first PCP is networked like that, but it’s highly restrictive – and both unacceptable and unnecessary.



Unfortunately one has to know what questions to ask. Whether or not all the physicans in your HMO will be available to you with the PCP you have chosen is an urgent question you should ask before making a final PCP decision. Find out who that PCP refers to when specialists are required. You don’t give up ALL choice by joining an HMO – or shouldn’t, anyway.



I don’t appreciate that Humana made me run such a maze and that I had to figure out the solution for myself (what if I hadn’t been a good reader? What if I was still working and didn’t have six hours or more a day to spend on the phone, reading my Humana manual and researching online?) When Open Enrollment comes around in October, Humana Gold Plus will have one less member.

Friday, January 10, 2014

Walgreen's AGAIN -- Really, Walgreen's? This is Your Best?

Strep throat.

No one wants to have it, and it's impotant that you get rid of it. If it isn't treated with antibiotics, you risk kidney or heart damage. Historians have recently determined that Mozard probably died of kidney disease brought on by strep throat, which was epidemic in Vienna when he came down with it. What a loss.

Yesterday I went to my doctor with an ugly throat. I left with a prescription for an antibiotic so I wouldn't go the way of Mozart. The doctor's office faxed the prescription to Walgreen's.

I asked at the doctor's office about this. I explained that the last time I had a prescription electronically sent to Walgreen's, it went to their email, and that they hadn't even opened the email three hours later. Oh, this is a fax, not email, they said. It will probably be filled by the time you get there.

Well, not exactly.

The Walgreen's I go to has some sort of intercept program that sends electronic faxes to email. I got to Walgreen's, and they said they had not received the prescription yet. I told them I had seen it faxed over, and ... they opened up their email.

They told me to come back in three hours. So I askd them why it would take so long. They told me that if I had brought a paper prescription it would have been filled within 30 minutes, but (although they didn't use these words) since it had been faxed, it would be going to the bottom of the pile. When I questioned this -- I was willing to wait a reasonable time, and the pharmacy technicians have a tough, fast-paced job where mistakes are not tolerated -- a second tech came over and told me that was just the way it was, and to go home and come back in three hours.

Well, I didn't go home. I went across the street to CVS Pharmacy and talked to their staff -- also very busy, but somehow not too busy to answer my queestions. They were shocked by what I said, and they said that they don't do that, and that antibiotic prescriptions go to the top of the list.

Well, that's it for me, Walgreen's. I didn't move my prescriptions to CVS yesterday because my prescription was in process at the time. I'm doing that today.

By the way, Walgreen's, once I was in CVS's store I also bought the OTC medication the doctor recommended for other symptoms as well as a couple of other items I needed. I spent more than $20 once I was in the store.

I'm just the kind of customer you didn't want to lose, Walgreen's. When faced with a choice between Walgreen's and CVS in the past, I always chose Walgreen's. I don't know why I stayed, but I do know why I'm leaving. Buh-bye!

***

By the way I tried to email Walgreen's about this. They required every detail of my address and phone number, and then informed me that my address "is not a valid address." I did try to go to them.Why do they need my street address in order for me to send them an email? I've never seen this online before. I think Walgreen's has management issues, and I think they go all the way to the top. Walgreen's might be a good candidate for the "Undercover Boss" show.

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

REFORM JUDAISM Online: Union for Reform Judaism

I went to this website a couple of months ago because of me deep interest, spanning decades. regarding converting to Judaism. I had attended a Unitarian church for some years but ultimately found it unsatisfying. I've done extensive research and talked to Jewish friends.

So what held me back? 5,000 years of history and culture. Being Jewish is not just a matter of beliefs and daily practices. It's a shared 5,000 year history, and I would not share that history. I feared that I would not fit in. Even worse, a number of Jewish friends told me I was unlikely to be fully accepted.

So when I found this article online, I read it carefully. The article is about the practice of "Oneg," or a meet-and-greet, often with food, after many Reform services. The article suggested that people in individual congregations tended to cluster with their established friends and not make newcomers feel welcome. The article had a number of suggestions for fighting that tendency, which I think is just part of human nature.

http://reformjudaismmag.org/Articles/index.cfm?id=2886

After reading it, I made a post. I asked if a non-Jewish visitor or recent convert was likely to be welcomed at Oneg. It wasn't hostile or rude in any way. The article went to the heart of my only reservation regarding converstion. For me, it was a crucial question.

Posts are moderated at this site, and my post never even went up. I guess I have my answer.  :(

Avoid "Register.com" for your blog -- bunch of CROOKS!

Bunch of CROOKS!!!

When I first came up with the idea of doing a sailing blog for newer sailors, I got a domain name. I ultimately decided I didn't like it, and didn't use it. Imagine my surprise this morning to get this email:

Thing is, I NEVER AUTHORIZED PAYMENT. They just decided on their own to JUST TAKE MY MONEY! Unfortunately for them I lost that card and it was replaced by a card with a new number, so it didn't go through.

And as for the "Renewal Private Domain Safe?" I didn't buy that the FIRST time -- they just tacked it on as icing on the (stolen) cake!

I urge people to avoid "Register.com" -- apparently they don't know how to make a profit honestly. Just ... WOW.

Here's the email:
support@register.com
   
5:11 AM (2 hours ago)
       
to me
Dear Susan Setley,

We experienced a billing issue with the following items purchased from Register.com:

--------------------------------------------------------
Renewal sinkorswimsailing.com $35.00 Exp:2013-12-18

Renewal Complimentary Webmail with Domain Name $0.00 Exp:2013-12-18

Renewal Private Domain Safe  $14.00 Exp:2013-12-18

--------------------------------------------------------

Please update the billing information for these items
at your earliest convenience:
https://www.register.com/interstice/053090cb0a16112822e8ffc909843aa9

Questions or comments?  Please visit us at  http://help.register.com/cgi-bin/register_help.cfg/php/enduser/ask.php

We thank you for using Register.com.

Best wishes,

Billing Support
http://help.register.com Register.com, Inc
Toll free in the U.S. and Canada: (877) 731-4442
Outside the U.S. and Canada +1 (902) 749-5919

Monday, November 25, 2013

It's Not Just Wal-Mart -- shop local!

OK, I admit it. I'm a little biased toward Wal-Mart since I worked there for about 3 1/2 months last Spring and Summer.

The truth is that the job (cashier) was enjoyable; I liked my fellow employees; the training was excellent and on-going; and in the short time I was there, three other cashiers were promoted, one of whom was hired the same day I was (smart as a whip, that young lady. She's going to do well one day.)

There were upsetting things about it as well. At the top of the list would be the fact that I checked out so many employees of the store who were on "food stamps." It's a debit card now, but it's governmental assistance because they can't afford to buy enough food to feed their families properly.

That could make you very angry at the store, make you want to rant and rave and picket outside, right?

Except that Wal-Mart isn't doing anything that lots of other stores aren't doing as well. Wal-Mart doesn't set the minimum wage, and if they changed tomorrow, there would still be lots of smart. diligent people working at thousands of other stores, at minimum wage or near it, struggling to put food on the table.

Now I'm seeing all sorts of anti-Wal-Mart comments on Facebook. No, it's not a perfect company, but I've seen posts urging people to "boycott Wal-Mart" on Black Friday because they're going to be open on Thanksgiving.

Wal-Mart didn't invent that disgusting practice. To the best of my knowledge, K-Mart did -- twenty years ago. K-Mart is now owned by Sears. Why not boycott the inventor of this nonsense? Why go to *any* store that was open on Thursday? We aren't going to change a thing by a few people boycotting Wal-Mart on Black Friday. Very few loyal Wal-Mart customers will do it just from the sheer convenience. They can get the groceries they need to supplement their Turkey Day leftovers, pick up that new TV for Grandpa on sale, get balls for their golf date on Saturday and bait for their plans to fish on Sunday, all in one store, one cart, one time of standing in line and trying to find a parking space on the busiest retail day of the year (those last two are huge).

It isn't an issue for me. I'm not a "high consumer" person. I won't be shopping on Thursday and I won't be shopping on Black Friday either. I think we'd all be a lot better off if we bought less "stuff."

But Wal-Mart isn't a "bad guy" here for being open on Thursday. They're the target everyone likes to aim at, and if they are closed, their previously loyal customers will go elsewhere.

Don't look now, but we live in a country based on a capitalistic economy. We're a free market society. Retailers try to draw us in and separate us from our money, and we can vote every single day with our wallets.

I'm all in favor of a boycott on Black Friday. I think it would be good for all of us. But don't just boycott Wal-Mart, who has finally caved to 20 years of pressure. Boycott ALL stores that were open on Thursday.

There will be less places to shop, and if you *really* want to vote with your wallet, shop locally. Go to the little independent stores in your neighborhood who struggle against the retail giants. But don't fool yourself. You can be pretty certain they are paying their staff minimum wage, and those staff will have far less chance of advancing themselves than they would at a bigger store.

It's all a trade-off; pick your target. But make sure you didn't just pick your target from buzz on the Internet. The Internet is full of misinformation.

Sunday, November 17, 2013

By-Bye, GoDaddy! I'll Use Anyone Else

I hope other bloggers see this and take it to heart.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153485805385183&set=a.223159205182.273856.550925182&type=1&theater

This is a photo of the founder, GoDaddy, standing by the magnificent elephant he shot and killed on a recent trip to Africa. It made me want to cry.

Some day I'll be moving my blogs off of Blogspot ...

and until I saw this, GoDaddy was at the top of the list.

No more. What a monster.

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Some Rules Were Meant to be Broken

From AOL:

Shouldn't the rules of an age-restricted community sometimes bend a little, out of compassion? That's what a couple in central Florida is arguing as they're threatened with eviction after becoming reliant on their son for assistance because of medical problems. Barbara and Andrew Gorski, both in their 60s, live in the "manufactured-housing" community of Gulfstream Harbor in Orlando -- limited to those 55 and older -- and both have difficulty walking, reports Orlando TV station WESH. Barbara Gorski has breast cancer and arthritis; Andrew Gorski has prostate cancer and a damaged spinal cord.



gorskis and daren chase face eviction
WESH-TV/AOL On
"They can't take care of themselves on their own," their 39-year-old son, Daren Chase, told the station in explaining why he lives with them. "I do everything for them." Because Chase is underage, Gulfstream Harbor has ordered Chase and his parents (pictured at right) to leave by next month. "They are throwing us out," said Barbara Gorski. "It's not right. We have nowhere to go."

Gulfstream Harbor management refused to discuss the matter with WESH and calls by AOL Real Estate for comment from Gulfstream's legal counsel and its parent company went unanswered at the time of publication. However, the Gorskis situation might already be familiar to those who live in age-restricted communities like Gulfstream. AOL Real Estate has reported on the issue of such rule violations before, but in those cases the residents who were seeking an exemption from age limits were themselves caregivers: They had custody of young grandchildren.

Among the issues of concern in those cases: That an age-restricted community could lose its exemption from anti-discrimination law if found to be making exceptions to its rules, and that its property values could be affected. A Tampa-based attorney who's written covenants for age-restricted communities in Florida told AOL Real Estate then of fears that "property values are going to plummet ... because now you have more people coming in ... and because senior citizens are not going to want to live in a community that has kids around."

Of course Daren Chase is no kid, but as WESH discloses in the video above, there might be another rule that he's breaking by living there.


I'm sorry, but this is an outrage.